No evidence that mandatory open data policies increase error correction
Hardwicke, TE et al. Analytical reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges in the journal psychological science: an observational study. R. Soc. Open Sci. 8th201494 (2021).
Enserink, M. Sea of Doubts. Science 372560-565 (2021).
Buxton, RT et al. Avoiding waste of research resources in conservation science. preserved Science. Practice. 31-11 (2021).
Tai, TC & Robinson, JPW Improving the Study of Climate Change Through Open Science. Front. Vicinity. Science. 61-5 (2018).
Popkin, G. Data sharing and how it can benefit your scientific career. Nature 569445-447 (2019).
Wilkinson, MD et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Administration. Science. Data 3160018 (2016).
Roche, DG et al. Slowly improving archival quality of open datasets shared by researchers in ecology and evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B Biological Science. 28920212780 (2022).
Tedersoo, L., Küngas, R., Oras, E., Köster, K. & Helen, E. Data sharing practices and the availability of data on request differ across scientific disciplines. Science. Data 8th1-11 (2021).
Christian, TM, Gooch, A., Vision, T. & Hull, E. Journal Data Policies: Examining how editors’ and authors’ understandings correspond to the policies themselves. Plus one fifteen1-15 (2020).
Sholler, D., Ram, K., Boettiger, C. & Katz, DS Enforcement of public record keeping policies in academic publishing: a study of ecology journals. Big Data Soc. 61-18 (2019).
Postma, E., Gonzalez-Voyer, A. & Holman, L. A commentary on The adaptive value of Vluttony: Predators mediate the life history trade-offs of saturation threshold by Pruitt & Krauel (2010). J Evolution. biol. 341989-1993 (2021).
Stodden, V., Seiler, J. & Ma, Z. An empirical analysis of the effectiveness of journal guidelines for computer-aided reproducibility. Proc. Natl Acad. Science. United States of America 1152584-2589 (2018).
Rohrer, JM et al. Putting the self in self-correction: Insights from the Loss of Confidence project. Perspective. Psychological Science. 161255-1269 (2021).
Vazire, S. A Toast to the Error Detectors. Nature 5779 (2020).
Culina, A., van den Berg, I., Evans, S. & Sánchez-Tójar, A. Low code availability in ecology: a call for urgent action. PLoS Biol. 18e3000763 (2020).
Roche, DG et al. Ways to more consensus building in experimental biology. J. Exp. biol. 225jeb243559 (2022).
Laurinavichyute, A., Yadav, H. & Vasishth, S. Sharing the code, not just the data: a case study in the reproducibility of articles published in Journal of Memory and Language under the Open Data Policy. J.Mem. Long. 125104332 (2022).
Roche, DG, Kruuk, LEB, Lanfear, R. & Binning, SA Public data archiving in ecology and evolution: how good are we? PLoS Biol. 13e1002295 (2015).
Besançon, L., Bik, E., Heathers, J. & Meyerowitz-Katz, G. Correction of scientific literature: too little, too late! PLoS Biol. 20e3001572 (2022).
Holmes, NP I’ve criticized my previous work on social media – here’s what I learned. Nature 595333 (2021).
Teixeira da Silva, JA & Al-Khatib, A. Ending the stigma of retraction: promoting the reporting of errors in the biomedical record. resolution ethics 17251-259 (2021).
Minocher, R., Atmaca, S., Bavero, C., McElreath, R. & Beheim, B. Estimating the reproducibility of social learning research published between 1955 and 2018. R. Soc. Open Sci. 8th210450 (2021).
Montgomerie, R. From the editor’s desk The American naturalist: Data transparency 2020. The American naturalist http://comments.amnat.org/2021/01/note-since-fall-2020-robert-montgomerie.html (2021).
R project. R version 4.0.3 https://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/old/4.0.3/ (2020).